WiMacTel, Inc.
Queja 137189 Detalles

  • Fecha cuando ocurrió 07/13/2014
  • Daños Reportados: $35.00
  • Phone Carrier:
  • !

The complaint is against an online dating profile

The complaint is a listing fraud posted on public forums or sites against an anonymous entity

The complaint is mobile text spam or smishing related against an anonymous entity

The company or person contact no longer exists

International boundaries

I attempted to use a payphone in Yellowstone Park to call a motel in Livingston MT. When I tried to enter my credit card number, the key pad would not recognize any of the touch-tone entries. I tried a couple more times with same result. I then tried to make the call with operator assistance. i gave the operator my credit card information and then waited for several minutes before assuming the line was dead.

I then moved to another payphone and got nowhere with entering my credit card information myself. I then attempted an operator assisted call. After giving my credit card info to the operator, the line went dead and after a minute or so i got the high pitched beep indicting a dead line.

Today i checked my Visa bill and saw that i was charged $35 by WIMACTEL. I called their number and was told that because my call was "operator assisted" I was billed extra. Also they incurred certain expenses in putting my call through. (Does make one wonder why all their phones won't work causing a user to require operator assistance). I explained AGAIN that the only reason I had used operator assistance was that the phone did not work and that even with operator assistance my call did not go through. This was all through NO FAULT of MY OWN.

The lady seemed to be trying to be helpful and put me on hold. When she came back she offered me a 35% refund. I declined this stating that since I received no service from them, nothing less than than a 100% refund was acceptable. She roboticaly repeated that I was billed extra for a Operator assisted call and they incurred certain expenses in making the connection. I restated my position and she put me on hold once again. On her return i was informed that i could get a 50% refund. I declined this again and insisted on a 100% refund. She told me that their position was that they had incurred certain expenses to put my call through. I reminded her that the call did not go through and I had received no service, through no fault of my own. I asked to speak to a supervisor. She said there was no one there. i questioned that if there was no one there, what was she doing while I was on hold. She then stated there was nobody there who could cancel the charge.

She told me that if I called back in 3 hours, there should be somebody there with whom I could discuss my concerns.

Don't know where this is going

¿Tiene una queja?

Presente Una Queja Ahora

Comentarios

No hay comentarios publicados. Sea el primero en comentar sobre esta queja

¿Tiene una queja?

Añadir una queja y correr la voz. Quejas de alto volumen tienen una mejor oportunidad para recuperar su dinero. Presentar un informe y unir fuerzas con otras personas como usted!

Presente Una Queja Ahora

Resumen del Perfil de la Empresa

  • WiMacTel, Inc. logo

EstadÌsticas de la Empresa

  • Queja Contra WiMacTel, Inc.
  • Quejas Presentadas: 248
  • Daños Reportados: $1,061,076.09
Visite el Perfil de la Empresa Completo

What is SBID?

SBID is a unique id code that identifies the user's computer and location. SBID is used to prevent fraudulent postings and help our community find users who create duplicate user accounts.