Direct Lettings
Queja 158823 Detalles

  • Fecha cuando ocurrió 07/21/2014
  • Daños Reportados: $1,880.00
  • Ubicacion Brighton Western Rd
  • !

The complaint is against an online dating profile

The complaint is a listing fraud posted on public forums or sites against an anonymous entity

The complaint is mobile text spam or smishing related against an anonymous entity

The company or person contact no longer exists

International boundaries

1) The £891 witheld is presumably for work done or to be done? This was not the case in both instances. I have email proof from new tenants and photographic evidence taken after new tenants moved in to prove this.

2) When Kingfisher Inventories inspected the property on the day I left, they had not been given Smart Inventories photographic inventory, there by having no comparisson. This is not fair adjudication, as the property was not in the best state when I moved in (please check on SMART inventory photos).

3) They refused to have a site meeting with me.

4) I have travelled from Surrey to Brighton to collect evidence from my old property 3 times which is a total of 6 hours diesel expense.

5) I have spent a good 42 hours writing emails, taking photos, collating, sorting and preparing a chronology, over the course of at least 6 days.

6) I lived in the property for a year and a half with 3 children. I consider the only damage to the property slight fraying, which is at the door entrance and exits. This surely would count as fair wear and tear for 4 persons over 1 and half years. Could you also take in to consideration that the carpets were loosly fitted at the beginning of my tenancy anyway.

7) If I had damaged the property further which I didn't I would understand the Landlord needing to keep the money (I have been a homeowner for 4 years and my sister is a LAndlady so I understand). But I actually improved the quality of the property, by adding security with a side gate, leaving rose bushes in the garden that cost good money, leaving a shower rail for the new tenants and clearing buckets of broken glass from the garden at the beginning of the property that the Landlord did not do, even though it is written and said that he did.


On all these grounds and the amount of evidence showing improper business conduct, please can you return the rest of my deposit £891. I have kept copies for myself and submitted a complaints form with the same evidence to the property ombudsman, to hopefully prevent this type of improper business conduct in the future for future tenants and to get some compensation for my time and resources spent in appealing.

Sincerely and exasperated

¿Tiene una queja?

Presente Una Queja Ahora

Comentarios

No hay comentarios publicados. Sea el primero en comentar sobre esta queja

¿Tiene una queja?

Añadir una queja y correr la voz. Quejas de alto volumen tienen una mejor oportunidad para recuperar su dinero. Presentar un informe y unir fuerzas con otras personas como usted!

Presente Una Queja Ahora

Resumen del Perfil de la Empresa

  • Direct Lettings logo

EstadÌsticas de la Empresa

  • Queja Contra Direct Lettings
  • Quejas Presentadas: 1
  • Daños Reportados: $1,880.00
Visite el Perfil de la Empresa Completo

What is SBID?

SBID is a unique id code that identifies the user's computer and location. SBID is used to prevent fraudulent postings and help our community find users who create duplicate user accounts.