FastLoan4Me
Queja 234689 Detalles

  • Fecha cuando ocurrió 04/26/2013
  • Daños Reportados: $30.00
  • Ubicacion Unknown

The complaint is against an online dating profile

The complaint is a listing fraud posted on public forums or sites against an anonymous entity

The complaint is mobile text spam or smishing related against an anonymous entity

The company or person contact no longer exists

International boundaries

    • FastLoan4Me.com Complaint / User Submitted Image #234689

$30.00 USD were withdrawn from my bank account unauthorized. I have no idea who they are & never spoke to them before. I tried called the number on the digital check they made to my account & it goes to voicemail
Phone Number: (775) 200-1525

¿Tiene una queja?

Presente Una Queja Ahora

Comentarios

  • tjulian488
  • tjulian488 SBID #964539ee36
  • Publicado 04/27/2013
  • In reference to this complaint, let it be known, certain items on a check is considered crucial in justifying it's validity. One most important feature on a check is the signature line. It is called a signature line for various reasons. 10 to 15 years ago, there were no such thing as a machine initiated authorization for signing a check. A check without a signature was considered nonvalid. Today, we cannot afford to allow mechanical signatures as an authorization for the same reason there weren't any such authorization 10 or 15 years ago. Yes, in binding documents, understandable. A check is a check and the safety ramifications used yesterday to establish it's validity is needed today, moreso. I question the authority who seem to feel we consumers are safe with mechanical signatures authorizing checks to be handled in such a manner. Bank lockbox operations are critical. It seems we cannot ill afford to relax in our discretion when processing this type of banking activity. Furthermore, a check printed with an account/routing number is not something you can go down to the local grocery store, or Staples and buy. A bank has to authorize the release of such materials at an expense. So, this entire episode is really ridiculous when you think about the process involved. To make any kind of profit in this business, FastLoan4Me would have to locate each target customer, request blank checks with account/routing numbers, order checks and start typing checks. The company in question seem to believe they can continue to debit the same account from one month to the next, even after it has been proven, illegitimate. So, therefore they must have a stockpile of blank checks with the same account and routing number on them. How can these folks get there hands on these blank checks? Are the banks given these checks away.
    Electronic signature on checks is bad news. We need to go back to the days of yesterday when handling checks. The proof is in this document. Rough draft!
  • Was this helpful?

¿Tiene una queja?

Añadir una queja y correr la voz. Quejas de alto volumen tienen una mejor oportunidad para recuperar su dinero. Presentar un informe y unir fuerzas con otras personas como usted!

Presente Una Queja Ahora

Resumen del Perfil de la Empresa

  • FastLoan4Me.com logo

EstadÌsticas de la Empresa

  • Queja Contra FastLoan4Me.com
  • Quejas Presentadas: 909
  • Daños Reportados: $81,388.60
Visite el Perfil de la Empresa Completo

What is SBID?

SBID is a unique id code that identifies the user's computer and location. SBID is used to prevent fraudulent postings and help our community find users who create duplicate user accounts.