The Hartford Insurance Co. & March U.S Consumer
Queja 253972 Detalles

I WAS BILLED FOR A DISABILITY PREMIUM MONTHS BEFORE WHICH I PAID.
WHEN I FILLED A CLAIM IN JANUARY 2012 THE CLAIM WAS WAS REJECTED
BECAUSE I WAS OVER 70 YEARS OLD. THE BILLING WAS SENT TO ME WHEN
I ALREADY WAS OVER 70 YEARS OLD. HARTFORD DENIED BENEFITS BECAUSE
THE BILLING ( MARSH U.S. CONSUMER ) COMPANY SET THE PROGRAM UP TO
SPECIFICLY TO MY STATEMENT. THE HARTFORD DENIED BENEFITS. I ENGAGED
AN ATTORNEY AND BENEFITS WERE STILL REFUSED. THE HARTFORD SENT A
REFUND CHECK OF PREMIUM WHICH I RETURNED TO THEM.
THE PICTURE OF THIS SITUATION IS THAT HAD I NOT MADE A CLAIM FOR
BENEFITS, THE HARTFORD WOULD HAVE KEPT MY MONEY.
IF I NEW I WAS NOT COVERED FOR DISABILITY BENEFITS BECAUSE I WAS 70 YRS
I WOULD HAVE NOT SENT THEM A CHECK. THE POINT I AM STRESSING IS
NO BILLING STATEMENT, NO PAY PAYMENT.
A RENEWAL STATEMENT IS A STATEMENT OF A PRIVLEDGE TO PURCHASE COVERAGE.
I DID NOT REQUEST BENEFITS TO BE PAID BY MARSH U.S. CONSUMER.
I BELIEVE THERE ARE WRONG DOINGS GO ON WITH THE BILLING METHODS
THE HARTFORD AND MARSH U.S. CONSUMER TO SENIORS AND THE COMMUNITY.
MARTIN NEWMAN